ÇØÇÇÀüÈ­¿µ¾î,È­»ó¿µ¾î ÁÜÈ­»ó¿µ¾î,¾î¸°ÀÌÈ­»ó¿µ¾î,ÃʵîÈ­»ó¿µ¾î,¼ºÀÎÈ­»ó¿µ¾î

Home > ¸¶ÀÌÆäÀÌÁö > ¿µÀڽŹ®

- ³¯Â¥º° ½Å¹® È®ÀÎ

easy ¿µÀڽŹ®
difficult ¿µÀڽŹ®


 
Topic : Calls for boycott spread after Starbucks Korea ¡®Tank Day¡¯ campaign
2026È£ 5¸é
 
TITLE : Calls for boycott spread after Starbucks Korea ¡®Tank Day¡¯ campaign

Calls for boycott spread after Starbucks Korea ‘Tank Day’ campaign



Starbucks Korea faces boycott after 'Tank Day' mug promotion backfires -  Nikkei Asia

 

 

A marketing campaign by Starbucks Korea has triggered strong public backlash and a growing boycott movement in South Korea. The controversy began after the company launched a tumbler promotion using phrases such as “Tank Day” and “Slam on the desk,” which many people saw as highly insensitive given the country’s modern history.

 

Critics linked the wording to painful historical events, especially the Gwangju Democratic Uprising, where military tanks were used to suppress protests, resulting in many deaths. Others also associated the phrase “slam on the desk” with the death of student activist Park Jong-chul in 1987, a case that remains a symbol of past government abuse.

 

After public criticism intensified, the campaign was quickly withdrawn, and Starbucks Korea issued an apology. However, the backlash continued, with some people posting videos of themselves damaging Starbucks products or asking for refunds on prepaid cards. The controversy also spread to other businesses under the same parent group, Shinsegae Group, as online users called for broader boycotts.

 

The issue also became political, with lawmakers reacting differently. Some politicians supported the boycott by discarding Starbucks products, saying the campaign insulted historical memories. Others made comments that were interpreted as supportive of the brand, which later led to public criticism and apologies. The situation shows how sensitive historical issues remain in South Korea and how quickly marketing mistakes can turn into national debates.

 

Edited using generative AI tools. 
Source :https://m.koreaherald.com/article/10742027

 

Comprehension

What caused the boycott against Starbucks Korea?
Why did people link the campaign to the Gwangju Democratic Uprising?
How did Starbucks Korea respond to the criticism?
What actions did some consumers take online during the boycott?
How did politicians react differently to the controversy?

Discussion

Why is it important for companies to be careful with marketing messages?
Should companies be held accountable for historical insensitivity? Why or why not?
How can social media influence public reactions to controversies?
Do you think boycotts are an effective way to respond to corporate mistakes?
How should companies respond when they make public relations mistakes?
Why do historical events still strongly affect modern society in Korea?
Should politicians express opinions about commercial brands? Why or why not?
How can businesses avoid unintentionally offending people?

Vocabulary

Boycott – a refusal to buy or use a product or service
Backlash – strong public criticism or negative reaction
Controversy – a public disagreement or dispute
Apology – an expression of regret for a mistake
Insensitivity – lack of awareness or respect for others¡¯ feelings
Promotion – a marketing campaign to advertise a product
Affiliate – a company connected to a larger organization
Public reaction – the way people respond to an event or issue